■ Solution date: June 2016 ■ Job title: National highway information collection and liaison service ■ Number of years of service: 2 years ■ 2 male contract employees
The company was entrusted with national road management work by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, and the union members were engaged in information collection and other work within the road management center. At the time of joining the company, the contract with the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism was explained to be renewed as long as the contract with the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism continued in one year. The center was in operation 24 hours a day, and the shift of work was two shifts.
The union members renewed the one-year contract once and expected a second renewal. “(Two people) are excellent, but they are not balanced with other employees and cannot maintain a peaceful workplace.” I was told that the contract was not renewed. When union members ask for issuance of reasons for termination of employment, there are employees who have said that multiple retirees have been issued due to union members, or that they will quit when assigned to a group to which union members belong, It was said that. The reason for hiring is against the facts. Requested collective bargaining for withdrawal of employment.
The employers repeatedly asserted that there were employees who retired due to power harassment by the union members, but as far as the union members knew, there were separate reasons for employee retirement. The power harassment of the union members became the agenda at the compliance meeting, and there was no attention or guidance. The employer’s allegations were poorly grounded and unreliable, so they strongly urged the withdrawal of employment but the company did not withdraw.
The union members wanted to settle their retirement assumptions and agreed to resolve the company’s retirement and pay the settlement money.